Sat May 12, 2012, 09:37 AM
sarcasmo (13,550 posts)
Tennessee governor signs controversial "gateway sexual activity" bill
Source: Reuters
Snip < Tennessee teachers can no longer condone so-called "gateway sexual activity" such as touching genitals under a new law that critics say is too vague and could hamper discussion about safe sexual behavior. Snip< president of the Family Action Council of Tennessee, which pushed the bill, said it does not ban kissing or holding hands from discussion in sex education classes. But he said it addresses the touching of certain "gateway body parts," including genitals, buttocks, breasts and the inner thigh. Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/tennessee-governor-signs-gateway-sexual-activity-bill-001703989.html The American version of the Taliban.
|
41 replies, 5590 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| sarcasmo | May 2012 | OP | |
| jberryhill | May 2012 | #1 | |
| Hugin | May 2012 | #2 | |
| roguevalley | May 2012 | #20 | |
| cstanleytech | May 2012 | #37 | |
| no_hypocrisy | May 2012 | #3 | |
| valerief | May 2012 | #4 | |
| Wait Wut | May 2012 | #5 | |
| LynneSin | May 2012 | #6 | |
| Blue_Tires | May 2012 | #10 | |
| freshwest | May 2012 | #16 | |
| atreides1 | May 2012 | #19 | |
| indivisibleman | May 2012 | #35 | |
| KG | May 2012 | #7 | |
| awoke_in_2003 | May 2012 | #38 | |
| C_U_L8R | May 2012 | #8 | |
| Botany | May 2012 | #9 | |
| lastlib | May 2012 | #11 | |
| IDemo | May 2012 | #13 | |
| cosmicone | May 2012 | #15 | |
| lonestarnot | May 2012 | #23 | |
| fascisthunter | May 2012 | #12 | |
| rurallib | May 2012 | #14 | |
| christx30 | May 2012 | #17 | |
| roguevalley | May 2012 | #21 | |
| mbperrin | May 2012 | #22 | |
| Marrah_G | May 2012 | #39 | |
| Lionessa | May 2012 | #18 | |
| Scuba | May 2012 | #24 | |
| olegramps | May 2012 | #25 | |
| riderinthestorm | May 2012 | #27 | |
| Iliyah | May 2012 | #26 | |
| DFW | May 2012 | #28 | |
| OVERPAID01 | May 2012 | #29 | |
| octothorpe | May 2012 | #31 | |
| sarcasmo | May 2012 | #32 | |
| truthisfreedom | May 2012 | #30 | |
| quaker bill | May 2012 | #33 | |
| TygrBright | May 2012 | #34 | |
| sarcasmo | May 2012 | #40 | |
| rug | May 2012 | #36 | |
| CarmanK | May 2012 | #41 |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:41 AM
jberryhill (29,848 posts)
1. This bill was watered down by the elbow fetish lobby
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:42 AM
Hugin (20,594 posts)
2. Be afraid of sex.... Be very afraid!
|
Boogah! Boogah!
|
Response to Hugin (Reply #2)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:16 AM
roguevalley (32,807 posts)
20. someone got weaned too young
|
I think the Gop have lost their minds
|
Response to roguevalley (Reply #20)
Sat May 12, 2012, 03:26 PM
cstanleytech (5,292 posts)
37. Well then they should try bending over and seeing if maybe
|
its in the same place they have their heads inserted.
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:42 AM
no_hypocrisy (25,290 posts)
3. It will be invalidated when challenged on constitutional grounds as too vague and extending
|
overbreadth to include conventional behavior.
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:45 AM
valerief (35,667 posts)
4. No more trips to the gynecologist! nt
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:55 AM
Wait Wut (6,152 posts)
5. That's it. I'm getting my eyes checked.
|
I read: "Gateley sexual activity" bill.
Look, I like Gateley and all, but I don't think we need a law keeping track of his sexual activity. It's not like he's an orangutan or some sort of endangered swallow. (The word "swallow" has no sexual connotation whatsoever. Get your mind out of the gutter.) And then...I read it again. Oh. "Gateway body parts". That's just fascinating. Depending on your fetish, that could be eyebrows. Tennessee family reunions are going to get really boring. (GOP families, not good Democratic families that are stereotyped because they live in TN. I understand. I live in AZ.) |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:55 AM
LynneSin (89,793 posts)
6. And these people were afraid that Sharia law would take over the land
|
They're just creating their own
|
Response to LynneSin (Reply #6)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:20 AM
Blue_Tires (31,647 posts)
10. the crazies hate competition
Response to LynneSin (Reply #6)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:06 AM
freshwest (31,289 posts)
16. The anti-Muslim thing was a shell game. See, no burka! Everything else, but...
Response to LynneSin (Reply #6)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:11 AM
atreides1 (10,166 posts)
19. The reality is
|
That they were against the Islamic version of Sharia law...this law and others like it is what they've always been in favor of...you see it's the "Christian" version, not the ones that the heathens adhere to.
|
Response to LynneSin (Reply #6)
Sat May 12, 2012, 02:36 PM
indivisibleman (163 posts)
35. isn't that the truth!
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 09:57 AM
KG (23,260 posts)
7. some days i think this country is just circling the drain...
Response to KG (Reply #7)
Sat May 12, 2012, 04:07 PM
awoke_in_2003 (18,479 posts)
38. Truthfully...
|
I think we are almost to the p-trap
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:06 AM
C_U_L8R (15,744 posts)
8. Obama's FORWARD strategy
|
Is looking more brilliant everyday.
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:16 AM
Botany (36,027 posts)
9. gateway body parts?
|
Last edited Sat May 12, 2012, 12:34 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) When I was a teen or in my twenties my gateway body parts was having a girl touch me. Old white dudes w/ too much time telling people that they are not related to on how to act. ****** maybe "the kids" could pull out a picture of
David Fowler of the Tennessee Society of sticking their noses where they don't belong and that would kill the mood. Way to go Tennessee get that teen pregnancy up there with Mississippi and other places that teach only sex education that doesn't cover sex. |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:24 AM
lastlib (3,739 posts)
11. Q: What's the difference between a conservative and a wood tick?
|
A: One is an insidious, primitive, small-brained, disease-carrying, bloodsucking parasite--the other one is an insect.
|
Response to lastlib (Reply #11)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:34 AM
cosmicone (3,368 posts)
15. LMAO
|
Ticks are arachnids and not insects but hilarious nevertheless.
|
Response to lastlib (Reply #11)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:34 AM
lonestarnot (71,133 posts)
23. What he said!
|
K & R!
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:25 AM
fascisthunter (28,608 posts)
12. religious nutcase with sexual hang-ups
|
stop trying to control people, you totalitarian undemocratic dorks.
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 10:31 AM
rurallib (31,119 posts)
14. better start building jails
|
maybe this is just a way to fill the jails for the for-profit prison companies.
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:10 AM
christx30 (1,166 posts)
17. I'm not sure I get the
|
problem with this law. From what I read, it's about teachers getting kids to touch each other for educational purposes?
Is that not correct? "hey Jim. Why don't you go ahead and get to second base with Jessica?" |
Response to christx30 (Reply #17)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:19 AM
roguevalley (32,807 posts)
21. paybacks. the authors didn't get any in high school
Response to christx30 (Reply #17)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:32 AM
mbperrin (6,782 posts)
22. Read it again. The teacher will not be allowed to discuss those body parts in relation
|
Last edited Sat May 12, 2012, 11:33 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2) to sex education.
Literally, the teachers will be able to teach holding hands. And kissing. |
Response to christx30 (Reply #17)
Sat May 12, 2012, 04:50 PM
Marrah_G (22,370 posts)
39. You need to go back and read it
|
It bans the discussion of anything except abstinence, hand holding and kissing. Basically sex ed will consist of........." someday when you get married you might hold hands and kiss your spouse and then you can have a BABY!"
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:11 AM
Lionessa (3,894 posts)
18. "condone"?? I don't think teachers should condone
|
or condemn. It's simply their job to teach the facts. This stops all discussion though, entirely ridiculous.
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:35 AM
Scuba (26,677 posts)
24. "Kissing and hugging are the last stop before reaching Groin Central Station."
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:35 AM
olegramps (3,925 posts)
25. I wonder when they are going to jail kids for playing doctor.
Response to olegramps (Reply #25)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:47 AM
riderinthestorm (13,153 posts)
27. Or the infamous football butt slap of joy
|
this law is ridiculous
|
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:41 AM
Iliyah (2,327 posts)
26. Why are these religious nutjobs
|
worried about whats going on in my life? Now you have to hide your feelings in public, what the hell? Now peole will have to sneak and duck. Hell you might as well put women on one side of the state and males on the other if they are not married. This is fucked up, severely and seriously.
Legislators from the party of the insane need to open up their eyes. The same people who are instilling these types of law are their themselves perverted, only sick minds think like this. This has nothing to do with GOD. |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:53 AM
DFW (13,327 posts)
28. Next thing in Tennessee: mandatory earplugs
|
The ears are gateway organs for extremely dangerous things, such as ideas, and
a good Christian state like Tennessee can't allow such radical things entering the gateways of its students, can it? |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 12:26 PM
OVERPAID01 (71 posts)
29. Very confused
|
I am not being sarcastic, I read this twice, and don't get it. What is it they are outlawing? Could someone take the time to explain what this law even means in layman terms. People can't discuss these things, can't perform them or what? Don't understand why a teacher would need to touch people in this manner to teach a class...
Seriously I am missing the point of this law, feel really dumb. I am usually able to read between the lines on these kinds of laws, but I find my self clueless as to the point of or even the meaning of this law passed. It is vague and confusing as towhat they are attempting to do or push. |
Response to OVERPAID01 (Reply #29)
Sat May 12, 2012, 12:34 PM
octothorpe (962 posts)
31. I'm with you on that...
|
It seems like a law meant to protect some fucked up hypothetical situations that never happen (or at least are extremely rare and are probably covered under some other laws or rules)
|
Response to OVERPAID01 (Reply #29)
Sat May 12, 2012, 12:51 PM
sarcasmo (13,550 posts)
32. I'M pretty sure it's an attempt to keep teachers from discussing sex ed.
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 12:32 PM
truthisfreedom (17,674 posts)
30. Remember, when you speak to someone, you're speaking to everyone they've spoken to, and everyone
|
they've spoken to, and so on and so on.
Always wear a gag. And blinders. And earplugs. |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 01:52 PM
quaker bill (7,127 posts)
33. Kids will figure it out anyway
|
They just will not know how to avoid STDs and unwanted pregnancies. There is a ton of evidence for this. The body is pretty well programmed to strongly desire romantic / sexual activity at a certain age. Having raised two kids, there is this point where suddenly, personal hygene becomes very important to them. Up to that point you have to argue with them to get them to take a bath / shower, after it, they go on their own and take alot of time at it.... It turns like a light switch, in short order there is a boyfriend or girlfriend....
The force behind this sudden change is vastly more powerful than parents or teachers. Try to put a lid on it if you want to, it does not work. |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 02:01 PM
TygrBright (12,813 posts)
34. "It is unclear from the bill's wording whether Tennessee teachers could promote masturbation."
|
Amazing.
Simply amazing. OK, here is my mental picture of the first day of what back in my day was called the "Interpersonal Hygeine" unit of "Health" class. "OK, settle down, students. We're ready to... Michael, was that your ring tone I just heard? I want you to bring that phone up here, turn it off, and leave it on my desk until it's time to go. Now." (waits....) "Alright, thanks. I know, you just forgot to turn it off. Anyone else 'just forget?' Now's your chance to turn 'em off, because the next one will go to the office until the end of the day." (some rustling...) The stakes for this year's "Stupidest State Legislature" award are pretty high. My money's still on Arizona but I have to admit Tennessee & Kansas' entries are impressive! amazedly, Bright |
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sat May 12, 2012, 02:47 PM
rug (47,168 posts)
36. Thank God feet are not off limits.
Response to sarcasmo (Original post)
Sun May 13, 2012, 08:20 AM
CarmanK (648 posts)
41. POOR, PATHETIC BACK WOODS TN. With all the farms, U wld hardly think kids don't know abt sex
|
This is just another example of where the state should really stay out of the business of regulating sex. Just who is going to be the SEX POLICE?? As if law enforcement doesn't have enuf troubles in UNJUST TN. Now they want to add another egregious attack on human dignity and rights in the state.
|

